ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2025
Peripheral nerve blocks vs selective spinal anesthesia in patients with femur fracture: a patient-, surgeon-, and assessor-blinded randomized controlled study.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06155903 (Peripheral Nerve Blocks vs Selective Spinal Anesthesia in Patients With Femur Fracture), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Peripheral Nerve Blocks vs Selective Spinal Anesthesia in Patients With Femur Fracture: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 'Peripheral nerve blocks vs selective spinal anesthesia in patients with femur fracture' - Uncertain evidence of superiority.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Article
- Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block as a Main Anesthetic Technique versus Spinal Anesthesia Combined with PENG Block for Urgent Intertrochanteric Fracture Surgery in Elderly Patients: Preliminary Results from a Multicenter Pilot Study.Local and regional anesthesia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProximal Femur Fractures (PFF) are common among the elderly and can lead to significant disability. Anesthesiological management typically involves Spinal Anesthesia (SA) or Peripheral Nerve Blocks (PNBs). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of SA and PNBs in elderly patients undergoing surgical fixation of PFF. The primary outcome was the comprehensive assessment of intraoperative hemodynamic instability.
methodsA monocentric, patient-, surgeon-, and assessor-blind randomized study was conducted at the University 'Federico II' Hospital of Naples from December 2023 to June 2024. Patients diagnosed with PFF and scheduled for surgery were randomized to receive either Selective Spinal Anesthesia (SSA) (hypobaric bupivacaine 0.5% 7.5 mg and sufentanil 5 µg) or PNBs (femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous, obturator, and sciatic nerve blocks). The study evaluated the efficacy and safety of locoregional procedures by analyzing intraoperative and postoperative adverse events, as well as the effectiveness of analgesia.
resultsThe PNB group showed a significantly lower incidence of intraoperative hemodynamic instability (16.7% vs 43.4%, p = 0.048) compared to the SSA group. Bradycardia was also less frequent in the PNB group (10% vs 33.3%, p = 0.028). Although repeated hypotensive episodes occurred in both groups, mean MAP, TWA-MAP and TWA-hypotension remained within safe limits, with brief episode durations and no need for pharmacological intervention. Mobilization was slower in the PNB group; however, these patients experienced a shorter hospital stay. No differences were observed in the need for analgesic rescue doses or in the incidence of postoperative complications, including PONV, DVT, MI, or neurological injury. Pain scores were slightly higher in the SSA group at 6 and 24 h, though the differences were not clinically meaningful. Both groups showed significant increases in NRS and PAINAD scores over time compared to baseline. Motor and sensory block onset was slower and duration longer in the PNB group, while SSA produced a faster onset and earlier resolution. Surgeon satisfaction, as well as estimated and actual surgical durations, were comparable between groups.
conclusionsPNBs offer an alternative to SSA by providing better intraoperative hemodynamic stability, a lower incidence of postoperative delirium, and improved postoperative analgesia.
trial registrationThis study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number (NCT06155903), registered July, 2, 2023, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06155903.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.