Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41340155›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2025

Peripheral nerve blocks vs selective spinal anesthesia in patients with femur fracture: a patient-, surgeon-, and assessor-blinded randomized controlled study.

Antonio Coviello, Dario Cirillo, Alessio Bernasconi, Andrea Uriel de Siena, Ezio Spasari, Maria Silvia Barone, Ilaria Piccione, Giorgio Ranieri, Andrea Tognù, Giuseppe Servillo and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06155903 (Peripheral Nerve Blocks vs Selective Spinal Anesthesia in Patients With Femur Fracture), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06155903 nacompletednot on this map

Peripheral Nerve Blocks vs Selective Spinal Anesthesia in Patients With Femur Fracture: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorFederico II UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled78ConditionsFemur Fracture, Peripheral Nerve Block, Spinal AnesthesiaArmsSelective Spinal Anesthesia, Peripheral nerve blocks, Anesthesiological mixtures (Spinal anesthesia), Anesthesiological mixtures (Peripheral nerve block)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Antonio CovielloDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Dario CirilloDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy. dariocirillo3@gmail.it.
Alessio BernasconiDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", Unit of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Naples, Italy.
Andrea Uriel de SienaDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Ezio SpasariDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Maria Silvia BaroneDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Ilaria PiccioneDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Giorgio RanieriDepartment of Emergency and Internal Medicine - Complex Operational Unit of Anesthesia and Operating Units-Isola Tiberina Hospital-Gemelli Isola, Rome, Italy.
Andrea TognùDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain, Therapy-ICU-ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe ServilloDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Carmine IacovazzoDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProximal Femur Fractures (PFF) are common among the elderly and can lead to significant disability. Anesthesiological management typically involves Spinal Anesthesia (SA) or Peripheral Nerve Blocks (PNBs). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of SA and PNBs in elderly patients undergoing surgical fixation of PFF. The primary outcome was the comprehensive assessment of intraoperative hemodynamic instability.

methodsA monocentric, patient-, surgeon-, and assessor-blind randomized study was conducted at the University 'Federico II' Hospital of Naples from December 2023 to June 2024. Patients diagnosed with PFF and scheduled for surgery were randomized to receive either Selective Spinal Anesthesia (SSA) (hypobaric bupivacaine 0.5% 7.5 mg and sufentanil 5 µg) or PNBs (femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous, obturator, and sciatic nerve blocks). The study evaluated the efficacy and safety of locoregional procedures by analyzing intraoperative and postoperative adverse events, as well as the effectiveness of analgesia.

resultsThe PNB group showed a significantly lower incidence of intraoperative hemodynamic instability (16.7% vs 43.4%, p = 0.048) compared to the SSA group. Bradycardia was also less frequent in the PNB group (10% vs 33.3%, p = 0.028). Although repeated hypotensive episodes occurred in both groups, mean MAP, TWA-MAP and TWA-hypotension remained within safe limits, with brief episode durations and no need for pharmacological intervention. Mobilization was slower in the PNB group; however, these patients experienced a shorter hospital stay. No differences were observed in the need for analgesic rescue doses or in the incidence of postoperative complications, including PONV, DVT, MI, or neurological injury. Pain scores were slightly higher in the SSA group at 6 and 24 h, though the differences were not clinically meaningful. Both groups showed significant increases in NRS and PAINAD scores over time compared to baseline. Motor and sensory block onset was slower and duration longer in the PNB group, while SSA produced a faster onset and earlier resolution. Surgeon satisfaction, as well as estimated and actual surgical durations, were comparable between groups.

conclusionsPNBs offer an alternative to SSA by providing better intraoperative hemodynamic stability, a lower incidence of postoperative delirium, and improved postoperative analgesia.

trial registrationThis study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number (NCT06155903), registered July, 2, 2023, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06155903.

Indexed as

Femur fractureLocoregional anesthesiaOrthopedic trauma surgeryPeripheral nerve blockRandomized controlled studySpinal anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID41340155
PMCPMC12676886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.