ArticleBMC medicine2025
Multidimensional structural-functional coupling uncovers network dysregulation and predicts binge-eating severity in bulimia nervosa.
Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Disrupted Functional Network Organization in Crohn's Disease: Interoceptive Alterations Linked to Anxiety.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBulimia nervosa (BN) is a severe psychiatric disorder characterized by dysregulated eating behaviors and impaired cognitive-emotional control. Despite increasing recognition of brain network dysfunction in BN, the interplay between structural connectivity (SC) and functional connectivity (FC), termed SC-FC coupling, remains poorly understood. This study aimed to comprehensively characterize SC-FC coupling alterations in BN using multimodal neuroimaging and to evaluate the predictive value for disordered eating behaviors.
methodsThis study enrolled 79 patients with BN and 69 healthy controls who underwent high-resolution structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI). Functional and structural connectomes were constructed using the Schaefer-400 atlas. SC-FC coupling was quantified using eight biologically grounded similarity and communication metrics. A multivariate linear modeling framework was applied to estimate region-specific coupling profiles. Group comparisons and ridge regression-based leave-one-out cross-validation were used to identify altered coupling and predict symptom severity.
resultsThe global topological properties of the SC and FC networks were preserved in BN. However, patients exhibited significantly reduced degree centrality and nodal efficiency in the inferior frontal gyrus within the FC network. SC-FC coupling, quantified using the matching index (MI), showed widespread regional alterations in BN, particularly within the default mode, control, and attention networks. Seventeen brain parcels demonstrated significant group differences in MI-based coupling (false discovery rate (FDR)-corrected, p < 0.05), with both hypercoupling and hypocoupling observed. Findings were parcellation-robust (Glasser-360 replication; Dice = 0.93 vs. Schaefer-400). Moreover, coupling features moderately predicted binge-eating frequency (r = 0.24, p < 0.001), but not questionnaire-based emotional or behavioral scores.
conclusionsIn BN, macroscale white-matter organization is preserved, yet focal prefrontal functional decentralization and widespread, parcellation-robust SC-FC coupling changes invisible to single-modality analyses were observed. Multidimensional SC-FC coupling provides a sensitive neurobiological marker that explains clinically relevant variance in binge-eating behavior, highlighting its potential as a target for personalized diagnosis and intervention in BN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.