SynthesisBMC neurology2025
Combined training improves functional capacity, fatigue, and quality of life in individuals with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMultiple Sclerosis (MS) severely affects strength, coordination, gait, and balance, leading to significant challenges for individuals. While exercise is known to benefit MS management, most studies focus on single modalities, leaving a gap in understanding the effects of combined training (CT) interventions. This systematic review aims to address this gap by examining the impact of diverse CT interventions on muscle strength, balance, gait speed, endurance, fatigue, and quality of life in people with MS (PwMS). The findings will provide valuable insights for enhancing rehabilitation strategies tailored to the multifaceted needs of PwMS.
methodsPrimary sources were gathered from eight databases: PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, EBSCO, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), CINAHL, PEDro, and Web of Science. The search timeframe ranged from the beginning of the study period until July 25, 2025. Quality assessment scores for the eligible studies were determined using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Standardized mean differences (SMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using either random or fixed models for the outcomes assessed.
resultsFollowing the screening process, 20 studies involving a total of 577 participants were included in the systematic review. The results of the meta-analysis showed that CT improved lower limb muscle strength (1.04 [95% CI: 0.59-1.49], p = 0.001), balance (1.20 [95% CI: 0.76-1.64], p = 0.001), gait speed (0.77 [95% CI: 0.35-1.18], p = 0.001), gait endurance (0.96 [95% CI: 0.46-1.46], p = 0.001), and quality of life (0.69 [95% CI: 0.43-0.96], p = 0.001). Also, the results indicated that CT decreased fatigue (0.82 [95% CI: 0.57-1.08], p = 0.001).
conclusionThe systematic review and meta-analysis provide compelling evidence that CT interventions positively influence physical and functional outcomes in PwMS. Specifically, the results demonstrate significant improvements in muscle strength, balance, gait speed, gait endurance, and quality of life, alongside a notable reduction in fatigue. These findings underscore the potential of CT as an effective rehabilitation and management strategy for PwMS, suggesting that incorporating such interventions into clinical practice could enhance patient outcomes. By addressing key functional impairments and improving overall well-being, CT can play a crucial role in optimizing the quality of life for individuals living with multiple sclerosis, ultimately leading to more effective and holistic management of the condition. REGISTRY NUMBER: CRD420251111193.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.