Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41340052›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

"It turns out I was wrong": a thematic analysis of medical students' reflective writing in an e-learning course on communication skills.

Laura Janssen, Kristina Schick, Sylvia Irene Donata Pittroff, Sabine Reiser, Johannes Bauer, Pascal O Berberat, Martin Gartmeier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura JanssenTUM School of Medicine and Health, Department Clinical Medicine, TUM Medical Education Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM University Hospital, Munich, Germany. l.janssen@tum.de.
Kristina SchickTUM School of Medicine and Health, Department Clinical Medicine, TUM Medical Education Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Sylvia Irene Donata PittroffTUM School of Medicine and Health, Department Clinical Medicine, TUM Medical Education Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Sabine ReiserEducational Research and Methodology, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Johannes BauerEducational Research and Methodology, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Pascal O BerberatTUM School of Medicine and Health, Department Clinical Medicine, TUM Medical Education Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Martin GartmeierTUM School of Medicine and Health, Department Clinical Medicine, TUM Medical Education Center, Technical University of Munich, TUM University Hospital, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-reflection and e-learning represent two recent shifts in medical education, offering benefits for teaching clinical communication, a core component of medical training. Integrating reflection exercises into e-learning environments can encourage students to engage deeply with course content and their own experiences, fostering self-awareness, novel insights, and professional growth. However, few studies have explored how online learning environments might support students in reflecting on their learning experiences. In particular, research is lacking on how medical students perceive their learning experiences in online environments, including reflection, especially in the context of clinical communication training. This study examines how students approached structured reflective writing within an e-learning course on physician-patient communication to explore (I) the learning content addressed in students' reflections and (II) the insights students gained through the course.

methodsFirst-year clinical medical students (n = 55) participated in an e-learning course, which consisted of three modules: communication basics, consultation structuring, and empathy and emotions. Each module included three guided prompts to encourage reflection. All participants composed nine written reflections. Qualitative thematic analysis of all 495 reflective texts was conducted to identify themes and insights.

resultsThe students engaged with core communication topics and developed greater self-awareness regarding their communicative practice. The reflections revealed challenges, perceived skill gaps, and new understanding. Five core themes were identified: 1. patient-centred communication, 2. conversation structure, 3. emotions, 4. learning experiences, and 5. attitudes. Themes 1-3 primarily described specific learning content and were closely related to the first research question, while themes 4 and 5 encompassed broader reflections on personal and professional development as well as intentions to apply lessons learnt in future practice, predominantly addressing the second research question.

conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that reflective writing within our e-learning fostered students' metacognitive engagement, enhanced their awareness of communication nuances, and supported transformative learning processes. Students not only recalled central course content but additionally explored topics such as dealing with their own uncertainty by examining their beliefs, attitudes, and challenges, recognising the role of communication in professional development. These findings align with previous research and highlight the potential of reflective writing to bridge theory and practice, contributing to students' growth as empathetic and resilient healthcare professionals.

Indexed as

CommunicationComputer-Assisted InstructionEducation, DistanceEducation, Medical, UndergraduatePhysician-Patient RelationsStudents, MedicalWritingCurriculumEmpathyFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchClinical communicationE-learningMedical educationPhysician-patient communicationReflectionReflective practiceReflective writingThematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID41340052
PMCPMC12676878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.