Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41340048›Full record

Observational studyBMC ophthalmology2025

Comparison of accommodation and vergence parameters in early and late-onset myopic adults.

Shravya, Salai Dhavamathi Janarthanan, Vijaya Pai H

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

ShravyaDepartment of Optometry, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Salai Dhavamathi JanarthananDepartment of Optometry, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India. dhavamathi.j@manipal.edu.
Vijaya Pai HDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceMyopia is a growing public health concern, and understanding the visual function differences among adults with different ages of myopia onset is essential for effective management. This study demonstrated that late-onset myopic adults have significantly reduced accommodative facility and lower fusional vergence amplitudes at distance compared to early-onset myopes. These findings highlight that the age of myopia onset influences accommodative and binocular vision behavior in adulthood, emphasizing the need for individualized clinical management strategies such as accommodative and vergence training in late-onset myopia. PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess and compare the accommodation and vergence parameters in early and late-onset myopic adults.

methodsThis cross-sectional observational study was carried out at the Department of Ophthalmology, Kasturba Medical College and Optometry Clinic, Manipal. A total of 60 participants aged 18-35 years with mild to moderate defined as a spherical equivalent refractive error of -0.50 D to -6.00D were included in the study. A comprehensive eye examination was done to confirm eligibility criteria. Those who met the inclusion criteria were categorised into two groups: one with those who had early-onset myopia (EOM) and another with late-onset myopia (LOM). Accommodation and vergence parameters such as the amplitude of accommodation, accommodative facility, accommodative response, AC/A ratio, near point of convergence, positive fusional vergence, negative fusional vergence and vergence facility were measured.

resultsA total of 60 participants (30 EOM and 30 LOM) were enrolled in the study. The mean age at presentation of the early-onset myopic individual was 21.8± 2.3, and the late-onset myopic individual was 21.9± 2.6. There was a statistically significant difference between EOM and LOM in both monocular and binocular accommodative facility, negative fusional vergence and positive fusional vergence for distance. Accommodative facility was reduced in late-onset myopes compared with early-onset myopes (OD: 8.5 ± 4.7 vs. 12.5 ± 4.5 cpm, p < 0.001; OS: 8.5 ± 4.1 vs. 12.0 ± 5.0 cpm, p = 0.001; OU: 9.2± 4.8 vs. 12.8± 4.3 cpm, p = 0.002;). Late-onset myopes also demonstrated lower negative fusional vergence at distance (break: 7.0 ± 5.5 vs 10.0 ± 4.0 PD, p = 0.002; recovery: 6.0 ± 5.5 vs 8.0 ± 4.0 PD, p = 0.005;) and positive fusional vergence at distance (break: 9.0 ± 8.0 vs 12.0 ± 11.0 PD, p = 0.018; recovery: 7.0 ± 8.0 vs 10.0 ± 11.0 PD, p = 0.024). Other parameters showed no significant difference between EOM and LOM.

conclusionsThis study concluded that late-onset myopic individuals have reduced accommodative facility and lower negative and positive fusional vergence for distance compared to early-onset myopic individuals. These findings indicate that the age of myopia onset may influence visual performance, and the consideration of its characteristics of onset should be included in clinical evaluation and treatment.

Indexed as

Accommodation, OcularConvergence, OcularMyopiaVision, BinocularAdolescentAdultAge of OnsetCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleRefraction, OcularVisual AcuityYoung AdultAccommodationEarly-onset myopiaLate-onset myopiaVergence

Identifiers

PMID41340048
PMCPMC12781340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.