ArticleBMC oral health2025
Prevalence and patterns of impacted third molars and their association with distal caries incidence in adjacent second molars: a CBCT-based study in a Saudi subpopulation.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImpacted third molars, particularly in the mandible, are commonly associated with complications such as pericoronitis, root resorption, and notably, distal caries in adjacent second molars. Despite this association, previous studies in Saudi Arabia have predominantly relied on two-dimensional imaging, which may underestimate diagnostic features. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and patterns of impacted third molars and their association with distal caries incidence in second molars using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
methodsA retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted from a leading dental center in Ha'il, Saudi Arabia, analysing 315 CBCT scans obtained between 2019 and 2024. The angulation, depth, and position of impacted third molars were classified using Winter's classification and the Pell and Gregory system. The presence of caries on adjacent second molars was recorded. Statistical analysis included Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests, with significance set at p ≤ 0.05.
resultsMesioangular impaction was most common in the mandibular arch, particularly among younger individuals (18-25 years). Class B and C impactions were prevalent in the lower molars, with deeper impactions more frequently observed in females and older individuals. Distal caries on mandibular second molars were significantly associated with mesioangular and horizontal impactions, particularly in the quadrant 4 CBCT imaging demonstrated a notable prevalence of distal caries, which appears higher than the rates reported in previous two-dimensional studies; however, direct intra-study comparison was not performed.
conclusionsImpacted mandibular third molars, especially those with mesioangular angulation and in deeper positions, pose a significant risk to adjacent second molars. While these findings highlight a potential role for early intervention, including prophylactic removal in selected high-risk cases, longitudinal and interventional studies are necessary to establish definitive clinical guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.