SynthesisLasers in medical science2025
The application of low-level laser in the treatment of periodontal Intra-bony defects: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of low-level laser application in the treatment of periodontal intra-bony defects. Two independent reviewers conducted searches for articles published in English. The primary objective was to investigate whether clinical parameters improved in periodontal regeneration therapy with and without low-level laser therapy (LLLT). The primary outcome was probing depth (PD), while the secondary outcome measures were clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession (GR), and bone defect depth. After screening and eligibility assessment, eight studies were included in the analysis. For the primary outcome measure (PD), after sensitivity analysis, the reduction in PD from baseline to 3 months was greater in the laser group than in the non-laser group (P = 0.02). For the secondary outcome measure (CAL), after sensitivity analysis, the increase in CAL from baseline to 3 months was greater in the laser group (P < 0.001). Although laser therapy may be beneficial for early wound healing, the current evidence does not support its routine use in periodontal regenerative surgery. Further high-quality studies are warranted to evaluate its clinical efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.