Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41339965›Full record

ArticleArthroplasty (London, England)2025

Management of retro-acetabular osteolysis with a retained shell and injection of demineralized bone matrix using a vinyl urinary catheter and syringe: a simple technique and case series.

Rit Apinyankul, Lelyn Lindo Silva, Puthi Tantikosol, Stuart B Goodman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroplasty (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rit ApinyankulDepartment of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand. ritap@kku.ac.th.
Lelyn Lindo SilvaDepartment of Nursing, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Puthi TantikosolInstitute of Orthopaedics, College of Medicine, Lerdsin General Hospital, Rangsit University, Bangkok, 10500, Thailand.
Stuart B GoodmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical Center Outpatient Center, Stanford University, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe management of retro-acetabular osteolysis in revision hip arthroplasty with acetabular component retention remains controversial and challenging due to limited access to the area. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE AND

methodsFourteen patients with well-fixed and well-aligned acetabular components underwent revision surgery and a retained shell. A vinyl urinary catheter and syringe were used to deliver demineralized bone matrix putty to the bone defect after debridement. Clinical outcome and radiographic follow-up were scheduled at a minimum of 2 years.

resultsThe revision arthroplasty survivorship rate with this technique was 85.7% (12 of 14 patients) at a median follow-up of 6 years. One cup failed due to an aseptically loosening cup, and another from late septic loosening. Significant improvement of the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) score, Harris Hip Score (HHS) pain subscale, and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS JR) were observed at a median 6-year follow-up.

conclusionsManagement of retro-acetabular osteolysis with injected demineralized bone matrix using a syringe and vinyl urinary catheter is a reliable, easy, low-cost method with satisfactory mid-term clinical outcome improvement. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

Demineralized bone matrixInjection techniqueOsteolysisRetro-acetabularVinyl urinary catheter

Identifiers

PMID41339965
PMCPMC12676840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.