ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2025
Development and validation of a convolutional neural network for automatic differentiation of primary central nervous system lymphoma and glioblastoma.
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and glioblastoma (GBM) are two distinct types of malignant brain tumors, each requiring specific therapeutic approaches. Accurate differentiation between these tumors is crucial for selecting appropriate treatments.
methodsWe developed and validated a 3D DenseNet264 convolutional neural network (CNN) to automatically differentiate PCNSL and GBM. A total of 141 patients initially admitted to Tiantan Hospital underwent preoperative T1Gd-MRI and were confirmed by histopathology. These patients were randomly divided into training and validation groups at a 7:3 ratio. Subsequently, the DenseNet264 was trained and validated using these datasets. External validation was performed using additional datasets from the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) and patients previously admitted to Tiantan Hospital. Standardized image preprocessing was conducted following the RSNA-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS 2021 guidelines.
resultA total of 623 patients (Tiantan Hospital: 535, RSNA: 88) were initially enrolled, of whom 316 patients (Tiantan Hospital: 228 [141 patients enrolled between December 2015 and December 2021, and 87 patients enrolled before November 2015], RSNA: 88; GBM: 159, PCNSL: 157) met the inclusion criteria. The DenseNet264 achieved optimal classification performance in the training set (AUC: 0.98) and validation set (AUC: 0.90). In held-out data from RSNA and patients enrolled earlier at Tiantan Hospital, the model showed similarly consistent performance (C-statistic: 0.77).
conclusionsWe successfully developed and validated a robust deep-learning model capable of accurately differentiating PCNSL from GBM. This model provides a reliable, efficient, and cost-effective clinical decision-support tool for differential diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.