Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41339940›Full record

ArticleGenomics & informatics2025

Metagenomic analysis of microbiome spatial dynamics in urban river confluence affected by city wastewater.

Nahid Parwin, Sangita Dixit, Sriansh Das, Rajesh Kumar Sahoo, Enketeswara Subudhi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genomics & informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nahid ParwinCentre for Biotechnology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (deemed to be University), Kalinga Nagar, Ghatikia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751003, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1695-3194
Sangita DixitDBT-Institute of Life Sciences (DBT-ILS), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3954-8527
Sriansh DasCentre for Biotechnology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (deemed to be University), Kalinga Nagar, Ghatikia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751003, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-2996-7618
Rajesh Kumar SahooCentre for Biotechnology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (deemed to be University), Kalinga Nagar, Ghatikia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751003, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4491-4168
Enketeswara SubudhiCentre for Biotechnology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (deemed to be University), Kalinga Nagar, Ghatikia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751003, India. enketeswarasubudhi@soa.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0571-6940

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnvironmental pollutants have a profound impact on microbial dynamics. This study highlights the influence of anthropogenic activity on the shift in bacterial diversity in the catchment area compared to upstream and downstream at Kathajodi, using a metagenomic approach for the first time in River Kathajodi.

methodsWater samples were collected from upstream, catchment, and downstream locations and transported at 4°C to the laboratory for DNA extraction, library preparation, sequencing, and physicochemical analysis employing inductively coupled plasma. The extracted DNA was sequenced via the Illumina HiSeq platform and analyzed through MG-RAST for taxonomic and functional classification using KEGG and COG annotations. Statistical diversity analysis, including rarefaction curves, alpha- and beta-diversity indices, and Venn diagrams, provided insights into microbial composition and community variations across sites.

resultsA significant abundance of pollution indicator members of phylum Bacteroidetes (29.82%) in the catchment (CM), highly contaminated with metals, fecal, and other organic pollutants, could be attributed to their high metabolic capabilities to degrade them. The pristine upstream (US) exhibited an abundance of Shewanella (25.04%), Pseudomonas (17.35%), and Synechococcus (5.62%). The CM, influenced by high anthropogenic activity, showed higher abundances of Flavobacterium (5.20%), Arcobacter (4.05%), and Bacteroides (3.88%). In contrast, downstream (DS), with fewer anthropogenic activities, displayed higher abundances of Aeromonas (4.40%), Acidovorax (0.52%), and Acidimicrobium (0.32%). The highest bacterial diversity of CM could be due to the influence of the physicochemical properties of city waste effluent. From the Venn diagram, 73 common OTUs at the genera level were observed in all three sites, which indicates that the native microflora of the river water niche remains unaffected irrespective of the temporary changes in the vicinity. The functional profiling through KEGG and COG revealed that CM was enriched in carbohydrate metabolism (12.11%), while DS exhibited higher contributions to amino acid metabolism, along with the highest relative abundance of general function prediction (R) (12.89%), all indicative of stress adaptation and metabolic flexibility under polluted conditions. The clean upstream is home to oxygen-loving helpful bacteria, the catchment supports nutrient-hungry and sewage-linked microbes, while the downstream is dominated by metal-tolerant and possibly harmful bacteria, showing the clear impact of human activities along the river.

conclusionsThe marked shift in bacterial diversity between US, CM, and DS regions highlights the ecological consequences of anthropogenic impact. These findings emphasize the need for effective environmental management to safeguard water quality and prevent undesirable health issues.

Indexed as

Anthropogenic activitiesBacterial diversityFunctional profilingKathajodiMetagenomicPollution

Identifiers

PMID41339940
PMCPMC12676890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.