Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41339900›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2025

Effects of the '10,000 Steps Duesseldorf' intervention promoting physical activity in community-dwelling adults: results of a nonrandomized controlled trial.

Paula M Matos Fialho, Elena Schmitz, Markus Vomhof, Andrea Icks, Alexander Lang, Oliver Kuss, Greet Cardon, Simone Weyers, Claudia R Pischke

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paula M Matos Fialho *Institute of Medical Sociology, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany. paulamayara.matosfialho@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Elena Schmitz *Institute of Medical Sociology, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Markus VomhofInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Andrea IcksInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Alexander LangInstitute for Biometrics and Epidemiology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Oliver KussGerman Center for Diabetes Research, Partner Duesseldorf, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany.
Greet CardonDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Simone WeyersInstitute of Medical Sociology, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Claudia R PischkeInstitute of Medical Sociology, Centre for Health and Society, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite approximately half of the German general population not meeting the physical activity (PA)-guidelines of the World Health Organization with further decreases noted during the pandemic, population-based intervention strategies to tackle this public health problem remain sparse. This study aimed to replicate the successfully delivered “10,000 Steps Ghent” intervention and research trial conducted in Belgium, two research questions were examined: (1) Do individuals located in the city that a complex PA intervention is implemented in (Duesseldorf) engage in more PA compared to individuals located in the control city (Wuppertal) after one year? (2) Is the proportion of those reaching 10,000 steps/day higher in the intervention than in the control city after the intervention?

methodsA nonrandomized controlled intervention trial was conducted among residents of two German cities. The 12-month intervention ‘10,000 Steps Duesseldorf’ was designed as a multicomponent intervention targeting different socioecological levels: at the intrapersonal level, a website allowed participants to self-monitor their steps; at the organizational level, workplaces and community groups were engaged through step count competitions; and at the community and policy levels, a city-wide media campaign to increase awareness regarding PA benefits was rolled out and street signage indicating walking routes were posted in different city district of Duesseldorf. To investigate intervention effects, PA was assessed via pedometers in two representative samples of adults aged 25–75 years from Duesseldorf (intervention) and Wuppertal (control). Measurements were taken at baseline (April 2021-March 2022) and again one year later (May–November 2023) and the same participants recorded their steps over a 7-day period at both time points. Baseline differences in socio-demographic and health-related variables between intervention and control were adjusted for in a propensity score model with matching weights.

results627 adults completed baseline and 553 the follow-up assessment (60% female, 60% intervention across both timepoints and cities). The results of the propensity score analyses revealed that intervention participants walked an average of 462 steps per day more (95% confidence interval: -146 to 1070) than controls at follow-up. However, the proportion of residents reaching 10,000 steps/day was comparable between intervention and control (Duesseldorf: 26.4%, Wuppertal: 25.6%) after the intervention (odds ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval: 0.41 to 2.66).

conclusionsAlthough the increase in step count detected in our study was promising, further intervention efforts and accompanying research are needed to meet the minimally relevant intervention effect of 1000 steps that was set in the original Ghent study.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register DRKS00024873 (Date of registration: April 21st, 2021; URL: https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00024873 ).

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth PromotionIndependent LivingWalkingAdultAgedFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulti-level strategyPhysical activityPopulation-based complex interventionReplication study

Identifiers

PMID41339900
PMCPMC12690824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.