Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41339894›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Patient experiences with collaborative practices between primary and specialized care in Norwegian cancer pathways: a qualitative study.

Katrin Mork Hove, Anett Skorpen Tarberg, Frøydis Vasset, Mads Solberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katrin Mork HoveDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Ålesund, Norway. Katrin.M.Hove@ntnu.no.
Anett Skorpen TarbergDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Ålesund, Norway.
Frøydis VassetDepartment of Health and Social Sciences, Professor Molde University College, Molde, Norway.
Mads SolbergDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Ålesund, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreased complexity and specialization of cancer care and treatments are posing significant challenges for patients navigating different levels and professions in the healthcare system. This shift necessitates coordinated care and collaboration across various healthcare providers. The study explores patient experiences with collaborative practices in clinical cancer pathways (CCPs) and examine their implications for a new initiative in Norwegian cancer care known as Cancer pathway - Home (CPH), which seeks to integrate primary care and core palliative care principles into clinical cancer pathways.

methodsA qualitative, descriptive design was employed, utilizing semi-structured interviews with 14 patients with cancer who participated in clinical cancer pathways. Our informants were recruited through healthcare professionals and local cancer associations. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis to identify themes and ideal types related to patient perspectives on collaborative practices.

findingsParticipants articulated a necessity for collaboration that addressed both the disease and the patient with the disease. Some participants felt like “packages” in a fragmented system, while others experienced more holistic, patient-centered care, particularly in rehabilitation settings. We propose a typology of four collaborative practices in Norwegian cancer pathways derived from the patient-perspective: ‘fragmented collaboration’, ‘complementary contributions’, ‘team-based collaboration’, and ‘co-navigated, patient-centered collaboration’.

conclusionOur patient-derived typology, ranging from ‘fragmented collaboration’ to ‘co-navigated, patient-centered collaboration,’ reveals a clear requirement for more integrated and holistic approaches to cancer care across the continuum of cancer pathways. Patients consistently emphasized the importance of collaboration that addressed both their clinical and psychosocial needs. The Cancer pathway – Home (CPH) initiative aligns with more patient-centered models and shows promise to enhance patient experiences by promoting structured collaboration, improving equity, and coordinating medical and psychosocial support. Addressing persistent challenges in collaboration across primary and specialist care is essential to overcoming fragmentation and realizing the full potential of integrated cancer care.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorCritical PathwaysNeoplasmsPatient SatisfactionPrimary Health CareAdultAgedFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPalliative CarePatient-Centered CareQualitative ResearchCancer careCancer pathwaysCollaborative practicesCoordinationIntegrated carePatient experiencesQualitative study

Identifiers

PMID41339894
PMCPMC12781790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.