ArticleBMC nursing2025
Job satisfaction and professional relationships of nurse educators employed in higher education institutions in Croatia: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe role of nurse educators in academia requires balancing teaching, research, and administrative responsibilities, often with limited institutional recognition or support. These demands can influence job satisfaction, professional relationships and faculty retention. In Croatia, where nursing education is still developing within the higher education system, little is known about the experiences of nurse educators. This study explored job satisfaction and professional relationships of nurse educators employed full time in higher education institutions in Croatia.
methodsAn exploratory descriptive qualitative study was conducted in 2024 among full-time nurse educators from 12 higher education institutions offering accredited nursing programs in Croatia. Data were collected through semi-structured online interviews. The interview guide included questions on job satisfaction and professional relationships. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsThe study included 52 participants. Participants generally reported high job satisfaction, associated with autonomy in academic work, opportunities for professional development, and meaningful interaction with students. However, dissatisfaction stemmed from administrative overload, limited financial incentives, and uneven task distribution among colleagues. Institutional support and collegiality emerged as key factors sustaining motivation and professional identity, while many educators expressed a desire for closer integration of academic and clinical roles to strengthen both teaching relevance and clinical competence.
conclusionThis study highlighted the complex interplay between job satisfaction, professional expectations, and institutional support of nurse educators employed as full-time faculty. The findings emphasise the need for institutional and policy reforms to enhance the working conditions and recognition of nurse educators. Reducing administrative demands, providing fair financial and professional rewards, and establishing structured mentorship and development programs could foster career sustainability and faculty retention. Strengthening institutional support for academic nurses is essential for maintaining a competent and motivated teaching workforce, ultimately improving the quality and continuity of nursing education and practice in Croatia. CLINICAL
trial registrationNot applicable. This study was not a clinical trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.