ArticleBMC primary care2025
Point of care devices in primary care setting in india: A scoping review.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPoint-of-care (PoC) devices represent a critical advancement in healthcare, particularly in primary care settings, allowing timely clinical decision-making and treatment leading to improved patient outcomes. Despite growing relevance, the deployment and effectiveness of PoC devices remain underexplored. The scoping review aims to collate the existing literature on PoC devices in Indian healthcare context, highlighting key concepts, identifying knowledge gaps, and mapping the landscape of available evidence.
methodsA comprehensive search was conducted across databases, like MEDLINE, Cochrane Database, and JBI Evidence Synthesis with no language restrictions. The reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts to select relevant studies based on predefined eligibility criteria. Data extraction involved charting key details, including study objectives, participant demographics, PoC device type, and outcomes. The findings were synthesized descriptively, focusing on identifying trends, gaps, and the distribution of evidence.
resultsThe scoping review reveals increased adoption of PoC devices, especially in settings with limited resources, highlighting their important roles in maternal health, infectious diseases, and non-communicable diseases. These devices improve early detection and accessibility to healthcare, particularly in rural regions where the demand is higher. Nonetheless, inequalities remain due to challenges related to infrastructure, financial limitations, and gaps in regulation. Furthermore, the long-term effectiveness of these devices is compromised by fragmented diagnostic processes, insufficient follow-up care, and difficulties in integrating them with existing health systems. Despite these obstacles, PoC devices present valuable opportunities to enhance decentralized healthcare delivery and boost patient outcomes.
conclusionsDespite the potential of PoC devices, challenges in digital health integration and implementation must be addressed to ensure their effective utilization. The review highlights the need for standardized guidelines and robust infrastructure to support their sustainable adoption. Additionally, further research is essential to bridge existing gaps and enhance their role in delivering equitable and high-quality healthcare across diverse settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.