ReviewNature protocols2026
Bioengineering mini-colons for ex vivo colorectal cancer research.
Review in Nature protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Status of Intestinal Stem Cell Research: Mechanisms, Intestinal Diseases, and Organoid Development.Cells · 2026Review
- Animal research in the UK: Regulation, implementation, welfare and development of new approach methodologies.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumor initiation remains one of the least understood events in cancer biology, largely due to the challenge of dissecting the intricacy of the tumorigenic process in laboratory settings. The insufficient biological complexity of conventional in vitro systems makes animal models the primary experimental approach to study tumorigenesis. Despite providing valuable insights, these in vivo models function as experimental black boxes with limited spatiotemporal resolution of cellular dynamics during oncogenesis. In addition, their use raises ethical concerns, further underscoring the need for alternative ex vivo systems. Here we provide a detailed protocol to integrate state-of-the-art microfabrication, tissue engineering and optogenetic approaches to generate topobiologically complex miniature colons ('mini-colons') capable of undergoing tumorigenesis in vitro. We describe the key methodology for the generation of blue light-inducible oncogenic cells, the establishment of hydrogel-based mini-colon scaffolds within microfluidic devices, the development of mini-colons and the induction of spatiotemporally controlled tumorigenesis. This protocol enables the formation and long-term culture of complex cancerous tissues that capture in vivo-like tumoral biology while offering real-time and single-cell resolution analyses. It can be implemented in 4-6 weeks by researchers with prior experience in 3D cell culture techniques. We anticipate that these methodological guidelines will have a broad impact on the cancer research community by opening new avenues for tumorigenesis studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41339776What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.