ArticleScientific reports2025
Detecting continuous structural heterogeneity in single molecule localization microscopy data with a point cloud variational auto-encoder.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The low degree of labeling and limited photon count of fluorescent emitters in single molecule localization microscopy results in poor quality images of macro-molecular complexes. Particle fusion provides a single reconstruction with high signal-to-noise ratio by combining many single molecule localization microscopy images of the same structure. The underlying assumption of homogeneity is not always valid, heterogeneity can arise due to geometrical shape variations or distinct conformational states. We introduce a Point Cloud Variational Auto-Encoder that works directly on 2D and 3D localization data, to detect multiple modes of variation in such datasets. The computing time is on the order of a few minutes, enabled by the linear scaling with dataset size, and fast network training in just four epochs. The use of lists of localization data instead of pixelated images leads to just minor differences in computational burden between 2D and 3D cases. With the proposed method, we detected radius variation in 2D Nuclear Pore Complex data, height variations in 3D DNA origami tetrahedron data, and both radius and height variations in 3D Nuclear Pore Complex data. In all cases, the detected variations were on the few nanometer scale.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.