Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41339749›Full record

ArticleNature methods2026

Atom-level enzyme active site scaffolding using RFdiffusion2.

Woody Ahern, Jason Yim, Doug Tischer, Saman Salike, Seth M Woodbury, Donghyo Kim, Indrek Kalvet, Yakov Kipnis, Brian Coventry, Han Raut Altae-Tran and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Generative design of programmable asymmetric β-barrel nanopores.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Zero-shot design of abioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Chemical reviews · 2026
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Woody Ahern *Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jason Yim *Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Doug Tischer *Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Saman SalikeDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Seth M WoodburyDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Donghyo KimDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8097-3675
Indrek KalvetDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6610-2857
Yakov KipnisDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Brian CoventryDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6910-6255
Han Raut Altae-TranDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Magnus S BauerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Regina BarzilayDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Tommi S JaakkolaDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2199-0379
Rohith KrishnaDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. rohith@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6387-9622
David BakerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. dabaker@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7896-6217

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-010680Microsoft GF117374National Science Foundation (NSF) 1918839National Science Foundation (NSF) DGE-2140004National Science Foundation (NSF) DGE-2141064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Designing new enzymes typically begins with idealized arrangements of catalytic functional groups around a reaction transition state, then attempts to generate protein structures that precisely position these groups. Current AI-based methods can create active enzymes but require predefined residue positions and rely on reverse-building residue backbones from side-chain placements, which limits design flexibility. Here we show that a new deep generative model, RoseTTAFold diffusion 2 (RFdiffusion2), overcomes these constraints by designing enzymes directly from functional group geometries without specifying residue order or performing inverse rotamer generation. RFdiffusion2 successfully generates scaffolds for all 41 active sites in a diverse benchmark, compared to 16 using previous methods. We further design enzymes for three distinct catalytic mechanisms and identify active candidates after experimentally testing fewer than 96 sequences in each case. These results highlight the potential of atomic-level generative modeling to create de novo enzymes directly from reaction mechanisms.

Indexed as

Catalytic DomainEnzymesProtein EngineeringSoftwareAlgorithmsModels, MolecularProtein ConformationEnzymes

Identifiers

PMID41339749
PMCPMC12791007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.