ArticleScientific reports2025
Biomarker studies to predict outcomes of patients with COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome measured pre and post initiation of veno venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) is a resource intensive and expensive therapy increasingly used to treat a select group of patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). High levels of Interleukin-10 (IL-10) are reported to be predictive of mortality in non-COVID ARDS patients receiving ECMO. In this study we evaluated if levels of biomarkers including IL-10 can predict mortality if measured prior to ECMO initiation in patients with COVID-19 ARDS. A total of sixteen patients with COVID-related ARDS undergoing treatment with ECMO were included in the pre-ECMO biomarker analysis, while samples from a total of 22 patients with post-ECMO samples were analyzed. Nine of sixteen patients with pre-ECMO samples (56%) survived to hospital discharge. There was no difference in baseline demographics between survivors and non-survivors. In univariate analysis, survivors had no difference in IL-10 levels prior to ECMO initiation although we identified several other biomarkers (Ang 1 and TNF-alpha with logistical regression, Mitochondrial DNA and IP-10 with Kaplan-Meier analysis) that differed significantly between survivors and non-survivors. Moreover, as opposed to a prior study, area under the curve (AUC) analysis showed that IL-10 levels were not predictive of survival. We advise caution for utilizing a single biomarker as outcome predictor in this highly complex population with often long clinical courses despite our promising results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.