ArticleScientific reports2025
In vitro anticancer studies of new derivatives based on the furanocoumarin scaffold.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biological Activities and In Silico Molecular Docking of an Aqueous Extract ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Molecular Profiling and Selective Pro-Apoptotic Activity of a Pruning-DerivedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Furanocoumarins, known for their diverse bioactivity, were chemically modified to develop new derivatives with potential anticancer properties. This study reports the synthesis and comprehensive biological evaluation of seven aminoalkyl furanocoumarin derivatives. In vitro cytotoxicity was assessed against four human cancer cell lines (HTB-140, A549, HeLa, SW620) and a normal keratinocyte line (HaCaT) using MTT and LDH assays. Compounds 4 and 6 demonstrated the strongest antiproliferative effects, particularly against SW620 and HTB-140 cells, with IC₅₀ values around 11-18 µM, indicating potent anticancer activity. Flow cytometry revealed that these effects were largely mediated through apoptosis, not nonspecific toxicity. Molecular docking studies identified interactions with EGFR and Bcl-2 family proteins, suggesting a pro-apoptotic mechanism, though additional pathways may contribute to their selectivity. Importantly, antimicrobial screening showed negligible activity against representative Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains, indicating a low risk of microbiota disruption - an important feature for cancer therapy. These findings position furanocoumarin derivatives, particularly compounds 4 and 6, as promising lead structures for the development of selective, microbiota-sparing anticancer agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.