ArticleScientific reports2025
Empowering emotional intelligence through deep learning techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We propose that employing an ensemble of deep learning models can enhance the recognition and adaptive response to human emotions, outperforming the use of single model. Our study introduces a multimodal emotional intelligence system that blends CNNs for facial emotion detection, BERT for text mood analysis, RNNs for tracking emotions over time, and GANs for creating emotion-specific content. We built these models with TensorFlow, Keras, and PyTorch, and trained them on Kaggle datasets, including FER-2013 for facial expressions and labeled text data for sentiment tasks. Our experiments show strong results: CNNs reach about 80% accuracy in recognizing facial emotions, BERT achieves about 92% accuracy in text sentiment, RNNs reach around 89% for sequential emotion tracking, and GANs produce personalized, age-related content that is judged contextually appropriate in over 90% of test cases. These findings support the idea that a combined model architecture can yield more accurate and adaptable emotional responses than simpler approaches. The framework could be useful in areas such as healthcare, customer service, education, and digital well-being, helping to create AI systems that are more empathetic and user-focused.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.