ArticleScientific data2025
A dataset of word recognition accuracy, times, and prevalence for 4,562 verbs and 4,562 pseudoverbs of Spanish.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current database comprises behavioral data from 267 healthy Spanish adults aged 18 to 51, who participated in a visual lexical decision task conducted in a laboratory setting. Raw data on response accuracy and latencies are available for 4,565 verbs and 4,565 pseudoverbs, along with word prevalence-calculated from accuracy in that task. Additionally, a filtered dataset containing response times (RTs) for only correct responses, applying commonly used thresholds for outliers, is provided. Reliability analyses (via ICC) demonstrated good to excellent scores for the entire dataset. Criterion and construct validity, including a comparative analysis with other databases, were also examined, yielding satisfactory results. The new data can facilitate researchers in conducting virtual or pilot experiments, exploring novel research questions, or constructing models of word recognition. Furthermore, they may be of interest at the clinical level, such as in the selection of materials for cognitive rehabilitation, as the behavioral data and prevalence can be utilized to organize words based on their difficulty for training purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.