ArticleScientific reports2025
A simple method that doubles learning speed for mice in touchscreen-based visual discrimination.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Touchscreen-based operant learning systems are widely used in behavioral neuroscience to assess cognitive function across various animal models, including mice. However, conventional training protocols for visual discrimination (VD) tasks in mice often require extended training periods. We developed modified touchscreen training protocols that enhance learning efficiency in VD tasks. Our method requires mice to perform two or three consecutive screen touches to confirm their stimulus selection. If inconsistent responses occur during these touches, the trial is reset. This approach significantly improved task acquisition speed. Additionally, we incorporated visual feedback after incorrect choices, which further enhanced learning speed and task accuracy. Using this protocol, mice rapidly acquired both initial VD learning and reversal learning, even with multiple randomly presented stimulus pairs. Furthermore, in serial reversal tasks, mice exhibited improved performance across sessions, indicating rule acquisition and cognitive flexibility. These findings demonstrate that simple protocol adjustments can significantly improve touchscreen-based cognitive assessments in mice, enabling more cognitively demanding behavioral experiments in preclinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.