ArticleScientific reports2025
Analyzing the impact of a discounted parameter on the reduction of collision time in Brownian particle trajectories.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using a set of nanosensors, we propose to study the existence of a finite tracking plan to detect a d-dimensional Brownian particle in the fluid. Each nanosensor moves iteratively along its path, alternating direction at random distances and velocities in both directions from its line's origin. These distances and velocities are expressed in terms of independent random variables that have probability density functions (PDFs) that are known. We further analyze the density of the random distances in our model by using the Fourier-Laplace transformation. Uncertainty is increased by the potential for a particle to collide with one of the nanosensors and the random sequence of turning points on each line. To account for this uncertainty, we might consider the search distance as a function of a discounted effort-reward parameter. The results of this analysis will give us the prerequisites needed to create a finite expectation value for the particle's first collision time with one of the nanosensors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.