ArticleActa neurochirurgica2025
MRI radiomic signature predicts peritumoral brain edema resolution following meningioma surgery.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- FOXC1 as a molecular predictor of postoperative peritumoral edema resolution in meningiomas.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Preoperative tumor and edema volumes as predictors of ischemia and morbidity after intracranial meningioma surgery.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntracranial meningiomas(IM) are often associated with peritumoral brain edema(PTBE), visible as hyperintensities on T2/FLAIR MRI. Postoperative persisting PTBE-like changes likely represent gliosis that, in turn, contributes to surgical morbidity. Since the human eye is unable to distinguish between PTBE and gliosis on MR images, we hypothesized that radiomic analysis of preoperative peritumoral T2/FLAIR hyperintensities could distinguish preoperatively established gliosis from reversible edema.
methodsMRI of patients with gross totally resected IM were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative PTBE were segmented on MRI. One-year MRI were classified into two categories based on whether PTBE resolution exceeded 80% of the initial volume. RF were extracted from meningioma and PTBE regions on T1-contrast-enhanced, T2, and FLAIR MRI sequences. The dataset was split into training, validation, and test cohorts(70-10-20%). Feature reduction used correlation-based exclusion and recursive feature elimination with cross-validation. Nine ML algorithms were trained and evaluated, and best model's interpretability assessed using Shapley Additive Explanations(SHAP).
results644 RF were extracted per individual from the pre and postoperative MRI of 123 operated patients. The Random Forest model utilizing 10 RF achieved the best performance (accuracy:0.91;precision:0.92;F1-score:0.92;ROC-AUC:0.94), demonstrating radiomics' utility in predicting PTBE resolution at 1-year post-surgery. SHAP analysis provided interpretability, highlighting key RF, differences between patient groups, and potential sources of algorithmic error.
conclusionsThese results underscore the potential of radiomics and ML to accurately predict postoperative PTBE resolution, differentiating transient PTBE from persistent PTBE-like changes (gliosis). This study provides initial insights into the potential of advanced imaging and computational techniques for non-invasive preoperative assessment, which may contribute to more personalized surgical strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.