Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41339573›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

A method for measuring closed-loop latency in gaze-contingent rendering without extra equipment.

Matt D Anderson, Emily A Cooper, Jorge Otero-Millan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matt D AndersonHerbert Wertheim School of Optometry & Vision Science, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Emily A CooperHerbert Wertheim School of Optometry & Vision Science, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Jorge Otero-MillanHerbert Wertheim School of Optometry & Vision Science, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA. jom@berkeley.edu.

Funding

NSF 2041726NSF 2107049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In gaze-contingent rendering, the visual stimulus rendered on a display changes based on where the observer is looking. This technique allows researchers to achieve dynamic control over stimulus placement on the retina in the presence of eye movements and is often used to investigate how sensory processing and perception vary across the visual field. Precise stimulus placement using gaze-contingent rendering depends on minimizing the temporal latency between a change in the observer's gaze position, measured using an eye tracker, and the corresponding change to the stimulus. This latency, however, can be challenging to measure reliably. Here, we present a simple method for measuring system latency that requires no additional hardware beyond the eye tracker and display, which are already part of the gaze-contingent system. Two small circles are rendered on the display to simulate the appearance of two pupils. The eye tracker is pointed towards the display to record both pupils simultaneously. One pupil is drawn based on a pre-determined trajectory, for example, moving up and down at a constant speed. The second pupil is "gaze-contingent": it is drawn based on the measured position of the first pupil. The time-lag at which the position of the second pupil matches the first pupil gives the closed-loop latency of the entire system. To validate this method, we added artificial rendering delays to our system and produced measured latencies that precisely corresponded to predictions, given the refresh rate of the display. This method provides a simple, low-cost way of precisely quantifying gaze-contingent rendering latencies, with no additional hardware required.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsEye-Tracking TechnologyFixation, OcularReaction TimeVisual PerceptionHumansPhotic StimulationPupilEye trackingFoveated renderingGaze-contingent renderingLatency

Identifiers

PMID41339573
PMCPMC12675766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.