ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Automatic rib fracture detection on postmortem CT data using deep learning.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the age of rib fractures throughInternational journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- From "high AUC" to evidentiary reliability: audit-ready deployment standards for deep-learning rib-fracture detection in postmortem CT.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the performance of automatic rib fracture detection of an existing deep learning (DL) model, nnDetection, on a postmortem (PM) CT scan dataset, and to identify the main factors of domain shift between clinical and PM CT imaging.
backgroundRib fracture detection and classification in forensic investigations is a time-consuming yet crucial task that can contribute to determine the cause of death. DL models are a promising tool, as recent research shows that radiologists using DL models can detect rib fractures in clinical CT scans at higher sensitivity and in shorter time.
methodsA dataset of 50 PMCT scans (24% women; age: mean 61, range 19 - 96 years) was retrospectively collected and annotated, and used to train a first instance of the model, nnDetPM. Another instance of the model, nnDetClin, was trained on data from another dataset, RibFrac, consisting of 660 clinical CT scans (36% women; age: mean 55, range 21 - 94 years).
resultsOn the PM testing set, nnDetPM achieved an average sensitivity of 70.2% and an average precision (at 0.1 intersection over union) of 78.1%, whereas nnDetClin fell far behind at 19.8% average sensitivity and 25.5% average precision, indicating a substantial impact of the domain shift from clinical to PM CT data. Further inspection of the results showed that the main factors of this domain shift were the position of the arms and the presence of medical ware in the image acquisition area of the PMCT scans.
conclusionThe performance of nnDetPM, with an average sensitivity of 70.2%, was notable and comparable to that of radiologists. However, more advanced techniques must be explored to decide if DL models can overcome the domain shift factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.