Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41339543›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026

Automatic rib fracture detection on postmortem CT data using deep learning.

Manel Lopez-Melia, Virginie Magnin, Sami Schranz, Vincent Andrearczyk, Adrien Depeursinge, Stéphane Marchand-Maillet, Silke Grabherr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluating the age of rib fractures throughInternational journal of legal medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manel Lopez-MeliaUniversity Centre of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva, University of Geneva, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1206, Geneva, Switzerland. manel.lopezmelia@unige.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5195-2543
Virginie MagninUniversity Centre of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva, University of Geneva, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1206, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sami SchranzUniversity Centre of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva, University of Geneva, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1206, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9151-1433
Vincent AndrearczykInstitute of Informatics, University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland (HES-SO), Sierre, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0793-5821
Adrien DepeursingeInstitute of Informatics, University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland (HES-SO), Sierre, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2362-0304
Stéphane Marchand-MailletDepartment of Computer Science, Viper Group, University of Geneva, Route de Drize 7, 1227, Carouge, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4875-6101
Silke GrabherrUniversity Centre of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva, University of Geneva, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1206, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9914-2310

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the performance of automatic rib fracture detection of an existing deep learning (DL) model, nnDetection, on a postmortem (PM) CT scan dataset, and to identify the main factors of domain shift between clinical and PM CT imaging.

backgroundRib fracture detection and classification in forensic investigations is a time-consuming yet crucial task that can contribute to determine the cause of death. DL models are a promising tool, as recent research shows that radiologists using DL models can detect rib fractures in clinical CT scans at higher sensitivity and in shorter time.

methodsA dataset of 50 PMCT scans (24% women; age: mean 61, range 19 - 96 years) was retrospectively collected and annotated, and used to train a first instance of the model, nnDetPM. Another instance of the model, nnDetClin, was trained on data from another dataset, RibFrac, consisting of 660 clinical CT scans (36% women; age: mean 55, range 21 - 94 years).

resultsOn the PM testing set, nnDetPM achieved an average sensitivity of 70.2% and an average precision (at 0.1 intersection over union) of 78.1%, whereas nnDetClin fell far behind at 19.8% average sensitivity and 25.5% average precision, indicating a substantial impact of the domain shift from clinical to PM CT data. Further inspection of the results showed that the main factors of this domain shift were the position of the arms and the presence of medical ware in the image acquisition area of the PMCT scans.

conclusionThe performance of nnDetPM, with an average sensitivity of 70.2%, was notable and comparable to that of radiologists. However, more advanced techniques must be explored to decide if DL models can overcome the domain shift factors.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRib FracturesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAutopsyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostmortem ImagingRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultCTDeep learningDetectionFracturePostmortemRib

Identifiers

PMID41339543
PMCPMC12957061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.