ArticleScientific reports2025
Early damage detection in bridges using a variational autoencoder-based hybrid unsupervised learning framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-term structural health monitoring (SHM) is essential for ensuring the safety and serviceability of bridges, yet systems face persistent challenges such as missing data, environmental and operational variability (EOV), limited labeled data, and low damage detectability. This study evaluates various hybrid unsupervised machine learning (HUML) frameworks, primarily based on variational autoencoders (VAEs), for early damage detection under severe EOVs and extensive missing data. Six VAE-based models are examined: VAE, VAE integrated with one-class support vector machine (VAE-OCSVM), isolation forest (VAE-IF), local outlier factor (VAE-LOF), density-based spatial clustering (VAE-DBSCAN), and Mahalanobis-squared distance (VAE-MSD) to empirically compare their performance rather than propose a new algorithm. The framework consists of four steps: (1) initial data analysis (IDA) to address missing data, (2) VAE-based latent representation to mitigate EOV effects, (3) HUML application to derive discriminative damage indicators (DIs), and (4) threshold estimation using extreme value theory (EVT). Validation is conducted using the real-world Z24 Bridge dataset. Three comparative studies assess performance in terms of decision errors, robustness, and threshold-free detection. Results show that integrating VAEs with anomaly detectors, particularly OCSVM, improves detection performance. Among the tested models, VAE-OCSVM achieves the best precision, recall, specificity, and robustness against EOVs, while VAE-IF and VAE-DBSCAN show weaker performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.