ArticleScientific reports2025
A DAG-enabled cryptographic framework for secure drug traceability with identity-bound authentication and anomaly detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Counterfeit pharmaceuticals remain a major public health challenge, particularly in regions with limited regulatory enforcement and digital traceability systems. This study addresses that challenge by proposing a cryptographically anchored drug traceability framework built on a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) ledger for secure, decentralized, and verifiable supply-chain tracking. Unlike conventional blockchain architectures, the DAG structure supports parallel transaction validation, zero transaction fees, and low-latency edge operations, making it suitable for real-time pharmaceutical monitoring in constrained environments. Each drug transaction is represented as a DAG node containing a hashed content identifier (CID), digitally signed metadata, and parent linkages that preserve structural integrity and tamper resistance. Encrypted Near Field Communication (NFC) tags affixed to pharmaceutical packages interact with Aadhaar-linked identities to enable traceable, identity-bound authentication. In this work, NTAG424 DNA tags are employed for secure data exchange, with on-chip encryption and mutual authentication to minimize exposure of key material and mitigate man-in-the-middle attacks. To support offline or rural deployments, the framework integrates an edge-ledger buffering mechanism that ensures eventual DAG synchronization via Merkle-root anchoring. Anomaly risks-such as tag tampering, scan failure, and connectivity interruptions-are predicted using a hybrid deep learning model that combines Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) layers trained on synthetic, simulation-generated datasets enriched with environmental and behavioral covariates. In a simulated evaluation encompassing 1,000 pharmaceutical units across five regions, the system achieved 94.5% anomaly detection precision, 0.92 traceability accuracy, and 85 ms median latency. All evaluations were performed in a controlled simulation environment using Docker Swarm-based distributed containers on Raspberry Pi 4B edge devices with IOTA Chrysalis nodes and Grafana analytics dashboards. All reported metrics are consistent with the performance summaries in Table 14 and Fig. 10. Overall, this research demonstrates the simulation-based feasibility of a DAG-NFC framework for secure and interoperable pharmaceutical traceability. The results suggest potential scalability and privacy preservation under controlled conditions, though full operational validation through real-world pilots and regulatory assessment remains an essential next step.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.