ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhancing innovation in medical students through imaginative driven models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chinese medical students lack innovation skills due to traditional teaching systems. To enhance innovation skills, the present study aims to develop a new learning model. This study develops an Imaginative Activity-Based Model by employing the Design and Development Research (DDR) approach to enhance Innovation for Chinese Medical Students. For the need analysis, data from 150 students were surveyed and thereafter analyzed through SPSS. Whereas data from 9 experts were collected to develop the design of the DDR model. The Fuzzy Delphi Method has been employed to test the data. The findings of the first phase, through 6 experts, confirm the need for the development of this new model. Findings of the design phase through identified 19 activities confirm the design of the new model. The third phase of evaluation evidence through defuzzification values ranged from 33.6 to 42.0, confirming the moderating level of experts' agreement on the usability of the model. Finally, it should be concluded that this model has potential for developing innovation in Chinese medical students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.