ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluating intraoperative C2 slope as a radiographic guide for cervical deformity correction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Achieving and maintaining optimal sagittal alignment is a key goal in cervical deformity correction, yet reliable intraoperative tools to guide alignment remain limited. The C2 slope (C2S) is a simple parameter that reflects the relationship between the upper thoracic and cervical spine and has been associated with health-related quality of life. However, its role as an intraoperative guide for alignment correction has not been fully explored. This study analyzed 45 patients with cervical deformity who underwent correction with at least 2-year follow-up. Intraoperative lateral radiographs were obtained before final construct assembly, and C2S was actively measured and used to guide correction through surgical adjustments. Radiographic parameters-including C2S, C2-7 lordosis, T1 slope, T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (T1S-CL), and sagittal vertical axis-were evaluated preoperatively, intraoperatively, and during follow-up. Clinical outcomes included visual analog scale for neck and arm pain, Neck Disability Index, Japanese Orthopedic Association score, and EQ-5D. Both C2S and T1S-CL demonstrated significant correction which remained stable during follow-up. Final C2S and T1S-CL also showed significant correlations with clinical outcomes. These findings suggest that intraoperative C2 slope may serve as a practical reference for guiding alignment correction and could contribute to favorable radiographic and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.