ArticleScientific reports2025
A multi-technique ensemble model leveraging attention mechanism and image processing for enhanced colorectal tumor detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-based tumor cellularity assessment in digital pathology: A review of methods, datasets, and clinical translation.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research introduces an improved method for identifying colorectal tumors through a combination of deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs), transfer learning, and sophisticated image processing techniques used on histopathological images. The suggested ensemble-based on ResNet50 and enhanced with a dual attention mechanism-surpasses individual model architectures by enhancing both accuracy and interpretability, allowing the model to emphasize crucial tissue areas pertinent to diagnosis. Segmentation techniques, such as watershed and distance transform, are utilized to define tumor margins and possible lesion regions. The dataset, obtained from Kather et al. (2019), includes 5,000 histopathological images spanning eight unique categories (tumor, stroma, complex, lymph, debris, mucosa, adipose, empty). The experimental findings demonstrate impressive results, achieving a training accuracy of 98.74%, a validation accuracy of 94.35%, an F1-score of 0.94, a recall of 0.94, a precision of 0.95, a specificity of 0.96, and a Cohen's kappa score of 0.9354, signifying outstanding inter-class consensus. These results showcase the model's strength across different class distributions and emphasize its possible clinical value in aiding the early identification and management of colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.