ArticleScientific data2025
Maps of forest vertical structure for Colombia, a megadiverse country.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Maps of forest vertical structure for Colombia, a megadiverse country.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vegetation vertical structure refers to the 3D distribution of vegetation aboveground biomass. Vegetation vertical structure of tropical forests influences other ecological and environmental variables that are essential for the functioning of the ecosystems. Integrating over 5.9 million Globel Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) footprints, multispectral, and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery, we built five national maps at 25 m resolution of five forest structural metrics for Colombia, South America, for the year 2020. We mapped canopy height, the height of half the cumulative returned energy from GEDI (RH50), total canopy cover, foliage height diversity, and total plant area index. The resulting maps tended to have the highest errors in the Amazon and Andean regions. Total cover had the highest relative error. Interrelationship curves between forest structural metrics of GEDI footprints are maintained across mapped metrics, indicating that the predictive models preserve structural relationships observed in GEDI data. Due to the medium-high spatial resolution and national coverage of the forest structural maps presented in this work, these maps will be useful for evaluating and mapping other ecological variables and conservation priorities in Colombia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.