ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and evaluation of hybrid harris hawks optimization algorithms for advanced engineering applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Harris Hawk Optimizer (HHO) is a recent revolutionary algorithm developed in the literature that simulates the cooperative hunting behaviour of Parabuteo Unicinctus. Despite its simplicity, the standard HHO often suffers from slow convergence, limited exploitation capacity and performance degradation on high-dimensional and constrained problems. This study aims to develop seven novel Harris Hawk Optimizer (HHO) variants, HHO-ADAP, HHO-CHAOS, HHO-Elite, HHO-GA, HHO-Inertia, HHO-PSO, and HHO-ULTRA, that integrate adaptive mechanisms, chaotic dynamics, elite preservation, and cross-algorithmic hybridization to improve the balance between exploration and exploitation. The proposed methods were rigorously tested on the CEC 2014 benchmark suite for dimensions 10, 30, 50, and 100, as well as ten constrained engineering design problems, and results are compared against state-of-the-art optimizers CMA-ES, L-SHADE, LSHADE-cnEpSin, SPS-L-SHADE-EIG, EBOwithCMAR, WMA, and OWMA. Quantitative results demonstrate that the hybrids consistently outperform the baseline HHO and classical optimizers. HHO-PSO and HHO-Elite achieved up to 35% faster convergence and reached solution values as small as 10⁻
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.