ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning approach for crop-weed segmentation in peanut cultivation using PSPEdgeWeedNet.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- DeepLabV3+ with MobileNetV3 backbone enhancement and multi-level fusion decoder for pepper field weed segmentation.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Weed management continues to be a significant challenge in modern agriculture, primarily due to the aggressive growth patterns of weeds and their direct competition with crops for essential resources such as light, water, and nutrients. Although recent developments in precision agriculture have led to the emergence of automated weed detection systems aimed at reducing operational costs and decreasing reliance on chemical herbicides, achieving accurate crop-weed segmentation remains a persistent difficulty. This is largely attributed to high visual similarity between crops and weeds, coupled with variations in illumination and field conditions. To address these challenges, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have been increasingly adopted for their capability to perform end-to-end, pixel-level classification, particularly when leveraging multi-spectral imagery. In this context, PSPEdgeWeedNet is proposed, a novel edge-aware deep learning architecture tailored for precise semantic segmentation of crops and weeds within peanut cultivation fields. Distinct from the conventional Pyramid Scene Parsing Network (PSPNet) and its boundary-aware variant developed as a baseline in this research, PSPEdgeWeedNet introduces a dedicated edge detection branch. This branch is specifically engineered to enhance boundary localization and improve delineation between adjacent vegetation classes. In post-processing, Conditional Random Fields (CRFs) are used to slightly enhance the segmentation results around object boundaries. Additionally, all models were trained on a curated peanut field dataset using class-weighted loss functions to effectively address inherent class imbalance. Comprehensive experimental evaluations reveal that PSPEdgeWeedNet significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art architectures including PSPNet, SegNet, UNet, DeepLabv3, Swin-Unet, and light weight transformer model based on ViT across multiple performance metrics such as Intersection over Union (IoU), precision, recall, and F1-score. These results highlight the critical role of incorporating edge-aware mechanisms within semantic segmentation frameworks, thereby enhancing the robustness and accuracy of automated weed detection systems in complex, real-world agricultural environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.