ArticleScientific reports2025
Foundation model based prediction of lung cancer survival using temporal changes in dual time point CT scans.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Derived Risk Groups and Clinical Implementation of Survival Prediction in Lung Cancer: Evidence from a Kazakh National Cohort.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lung cancer remains a significant cause of mortality, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) representing most cases. Currently, clinical data based models fall short in predicting survival while more advanced deep learning based image models require vast amounts of data and are often limited to predictions based on single time points. This study uses dual time point CT scans and features derived from a foundation model to predict survival. A dataset containing 102 NSCLC patients treated with radiation therapy was used, with each patient having both pre-treatment and post-treatment CT scans. A foundation model applied to the scans generated high-dimensional feature vectors and these vectors were then further summarized. Statistical analyses, including random forest and gradient boosted survival models, were then used to predict survival. The results demonstrated that temporal changes in feature vectors, specifically the Euclidean distance and element-wise subtracted feature vectors, can offer improved prediction of survival over single-time point features and clinical data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.