ArticleNPJ science of learning2025
Learning visual to auditory sensory substitution reveals flexibility in image to sound mapping.
Article in NPJ science of learning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early acquisition efficiency in visual-to-auditory sensory substitution: the role of structured learning.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual-to-auditory sensory substitution devices (SSDs) translate images to sounds. One SSD, The vOICe, translates a pixel's vertical position into pitch and horizontal position into time. This mapping is primarily based on technical considerations for preserving image content in human-audible sounds without presupposing intuitiveness, although some literature also invokes crossmodal correspondences in perception, such as pitch for elevation. We investigated these presuppositions and the efficacy of learning a traditional algorithm (i.e., pitch indicating elevation and time indicating azimuth) versus a reversed algorithm (i.e., pitch indicating azimuth and time indicating elevation), or an arbitrary single-tone control mapping (i.e., each visual stimulus was represented by a single non-systematic pitch-time pairing without structured spatial correspondences). Sixty sighted adults participated with random assignment to the Traditional, Reversed, or Control groups. They completed learning and evaluation sessions using simplified black-and-white visual stimuli. Both the Traditional and Reversed groups learned mappings within 30 minutes and demonstrated successful recognition of novel stimuli, outperforming the Control group but not differing between them. Structured mappings facilitate SSD learning. Mapping pixel position onto spectral-temporal acoustic axes appears flexible, rather than anchored to cross-modal correspondences. These findings reveal how SSDs may be rendered bespoke across user, stimuli, and functionality levels.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.