Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41339345›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Telomere-to-telomere genome assembly of the Dipteran Bactrocera dorsalis from a single individual.

Wei Liu, Qiang Lin, Qi Wang, Wanfei Liu, Jing Jia, Jie Zhang, Ling Yang, Yongyue Lu, Peng Cui, Guirong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Insects · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wei Liu *Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5852-2336
Qiang Lin *Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2882-7758
Qi Wang *School of Forestry, Key Laboratory of Sustainable Forest Ecosystem Management-Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China.
Wanfei LiuShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6637-6807
Jing JiaShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Jie ZhangHubei Key Laboratory of Biological Resources Protection and Utilization, College of Forestry and Horticulture, HuBei Min Zu University, Enshi, China.
Ling YangCollege of Forestry, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, China.
Yongyue LuDepartment of Entomology, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5813-8446
Peng CuiShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China. cuipeng@caas.cn.
Guirong WangShenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China. wangguirong@caas.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9391-931X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dipteran insects include numerous harmful species that cause significant agricultural damage. However, assembly of genomes for species in this order has been difficult due to their small body size, poor conservation of telomere and centromere structures, high levels of heterozygosity, and complex genetic backgrounds. In this study, we assemble a high-quality 596 Mb telomere-to-telomere genome for Bactrocera dorsalis, a fruit crop pest, using a strategy with a low-input HiFi CCS library from a male individual and an ONT sequence from pooled inbred individuals. The assembly includes complete structural organization information for centromeres and telomeres, providing insights into the evolution of chromosome structure in insects. Comparative genomic analysis reveals the polyphyletic origin of sex chromosomes across Diptera. Furthermore, we identify a homolog of ATPsynβ as a Y chromosome-specific gene that is highly expressed across multiple male tissues and may provide critical support for male-specific physiological activities. Additionally, we discover several tandem duplications of odorant receptor genes, including a triplet of the OR88a family, which was validated to be involved in the behavioral response to methyl eugenol. In summary, this complete reference genome provides a foundation for future genomic research in Diptera and offers genetic insights for the control of B. dorsalis.

Indexed as

Genome, InsectTelomereTephritidaeAnimalsCentromereChromosomes, InsectFemaleGenomicsInsect ProteinsMalePhylogenyReceptors, OdorantInsect ProteinsReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID41339345
PMCPMC12675626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.