ArticleScientific data2025
An EEG Dataset on Aesthetic and Creative Judgments of Brief Structured Poetry.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neural substrates of ambiguity and beauty in haiku poetry: an fMRI study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding how the brain engages with poetic language is key to advancing empirical research on aesthetic and creative cognition. We present a 64-channel EEG and behavioural dataset from 51 participants who read and evaluated 210 short English-language texts (70 Haiku, poems focusing on nature; 70 Senryu, poems focusing on emotion; 70 structurally-matched non-poetic control texts). Participants rated each stimulus on five dimensions (aesthetic appeal, vivid imagery, emotional impact, originality and creativity) on a 7-point scale. The dataset includes time-aligned EEG and behavioural responses, self-report trait measures, and rich stimulus metadata. Further, the dataset also includes resting state EEG data before and after the experiment. Exploratory validation analysis revealed condition-specific spectral power differences and trial-level brain-behaviour associations. By combining poetic structure, subjective evaluation, and high-temporal-resolution neural activity, this comprehensive dataset enables detailed investigation into neuroaesthetics, cognitive poetics, and the neuroscience of creativity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.