Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41339259›Full record

ArticleNursing open2025

Schutz and Peplau: Possibilities for Dialogue Between Research and Nursing Care.

Aldair Weber, Paula F Lopes, Caroline F Pereira, Vanessa P Toledo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aldair WeberSchool of Nursing, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5258-5635
Paula F LopesSchool of Nursing, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8392-3756
Caroline F PereiraPsychiatric Nursing Department, School of Nursing, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5578-8753
Vanessa P ToledoSchool of Nursing, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4009-1042

Funding

Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo examine Schutz's and Peplau's theories and possibilities for dialogue, explaining this theoretical-methodological framework's application in psychiatric-mental health nursing research and care. DESIGN AND

methodsA theoretical, qualitative study aligned with the foundational works of Schutz and Peplau, supported by the authors' practical experience and studies related to psychiatric and mental health nursing.

resultsThe study identifies areas of convergence between the concepts, despite their development in different periods. The intersubjective nature of psychiatric and mental health nursing facilitates meaningful encounters with others, focusing on care practices that integrate what is known with intentional actions. Interpersonal and face-to-face relationships highlight the importance of individual experiences within their lived contexts. The dialogue between these theoretical concepts underscores the value of biographical elements, personal motivations and shared experiences in the process of care, emphasising the relational aspects of nursing practice. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: This study demonstrates alignment between Peplau's principles and Schutz's theoretical-methodological framework, offering new insights into the phenomenon of care in psychiatric and mental health nursing. By deepening this understanding, nursing practice can be further enhanced to better meet the needs of patients and advance the field. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePsychiatric NursingHumansMental HealthNurse-Patient Relationsinterpersonal relationshipsmental healthnursing carepsychiatric‐mental health nursingqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID41339259
PMCPMC12674959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.