ArticleHeart (British Cardiac Society)2026
Long-term prognostic impact of complete revascularisation defined by CT-derived fractional flow reserve.
Article in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- AssociatedPublication
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComplete revascularisation has been associated with improved short-term outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease, but whether these benefits persist long-term and can be defined non-invasively remains uncertain. We investigated the long-term prognostic impact of complete versus incomplete revascularisation determined by coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR
methodsIn this prospective multicentre study, 900 patients with new-onset stable angina and at least one coronary stenosis of 30% or greater on coronary CT angiography were followed for a median of 7 years. FFR
resultsOf 900 patients, 210 (23%) were classified as incompletely revascularised, 167 (19%) as completely revascularised and 523 (58%) as having normal physiology. The primary endpoint occurred in 34 of 210 (16.2%) incompletely revascularised patients, 13 of 167 (7.8%) completely revascularised patients and 30 of 523 (5.7%) with normal physiology. Incomplete revascularisation was associated with higher risk compared with complete revascularisation (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.23 to 4.42; p=0.01) and normal physiology (HR 3.54, 95% CI 2.16 to 5.81; p<0.001). These associations remained significant after adjustment for total plaque burden, and the risk difference persisted beyond 3 years of follow-up.
conclusionComplete revascularisation defined by CT-derived fractional flow reserve was associated with a sustained reduction in cardiovascular death and spontaneous myocardial infarction over 7 years, supporting its potential role as a non-invasive tool to guide revascularisation strategies in stable coronary artery disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.