ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2026
Seroepidemiological survey of sealpox virus infection in marine mammals.
Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current study conducted a seroepidemiological survey of sealpox virus infection in marine mammals in Japan. A total of 112 serum/plasma samples from 23 marine mammal species (pinnipeds, cetaceans, marine fissipeds, and sirenians) from 16 aquaria in Japan were collected and subjected to an improved enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detecting antibodies against sealpox virus, employing the recombinant major envelope protein of the virus produced in Escherichia coli. Results revealed that the tested marine mammals were seronegative, indicating that these mammals housed in various aquaria in Japan show no detectable serological evidence of the current or past infection. Results suggest that a low prevalence or absence of active infection may lead to a low risk of transmission to humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.