ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2025
Examining the impact of gestational diabetes genetic susceptibility variants on maternal glucose levels during and post pregnancy.
Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimGenetic variants associated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM, n=14 SNPs) were recently classified into two groups: type 2 diabetes predominant effects (Class-T, three SNPs) and GDM-predominant effects (Class-G, eight SNPs; three SNPs unclassified). We aimed to compare the effects of GDM-associated variants on glucose levels (fasting glucose and 2-hour post-OGTT) measured during versus post pregnancy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsWe calculated genetic scores (GS) by class (T_GS and G_GS) and overall (All_GS) in 10 225 pregnant women and 4763 women post pregnancy (mean 10.5 years post pregnancy) from eight datasets representing four ancestrally-diverse cohorts: Exeter Family Study of Childhood Health, Genetics of Glucose Regulation in Gestation and Growth, Hyperglycaemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome, and Finnish Gestational Diabetes. We used linear regression models adjusted for ancestry principal components to investigate associations between standardized GS and glucose levels during or post pregnancy. Analyses were performed separately in each dataset and then combined using inverse-variance weighted random-effects meta-analyses.
resultsAll_GS was associated with fasting glucose both during and post pregnancy (β (95% CI), in mmol/L per 1 SD higher GS=0.06 (0.04 to 0.08) during vs 0.06 (0.04 to 0.07) post pregnancy). All_GS was also associated with 2-hour post-OGTT glucose levels during pregnancy but not after (0.10 (0.04 to 0.15) during vs 0.01 (-0.04 to 0.07) post pregnancy). Both G_GS and T_GS showed consistent associations with fasting glucose during and post pregnancy (0.06 (0.04 to 0.08) during and 0.05 (0.03 to 0.07) post pregnancy for G_GS; 0.02 (0.01 to 0.02) during and 0.02 (-0.001; 0.05) post pregnancy for T_GS). G_GS showed weak evidence of association with 2-hour glucose levels during pregnancy (0.06 (-0.002 to 0.11)) and no association with 2-hour glucose levels post pregnancy (-0.03 (-0.08 to 0.03)). However, T_GS was associated with 2-hour glucose during pregnancy and post pregnancy (0.10 (0.04 to 0.16) and 0.06 (0.01 to 0.12)).
conclusionConsistent associations with fasting glucose levels during and after pregnancy may suggest that biological pathways underlying GDM genetic susceptibility to fasting hyperglycemia are not pregnancy specific. However, the results for All_GS and 2-hour glucose provide evidence that some genetic associations with postprandial glucose may be stronger in pregnancy and should be followed up in larger samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.