ReviewBMJ open gastroenterology2025
Serrated polyps in the colorectum: clinical significance and future directions.
Review in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Endoscopic Hallmarks of Sessile Serrated Lesions: A Systematic Review of an Evolving Concept.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Baseline characteristics of participants recruited into the COLO-COHORT study: a UK-wide resource for colorectal cancer prevention.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2026Observational
- Mutational landscape in the precancerous stages of sporadic colorectal cancer.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Histopathological characteristics of screen-detected colorectal cancers.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Serrated polyps are believed to play an important role in the development of colorectal cancer (CRC). They share molecular characteristics and proximal colonic location with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC), indicating that they may give rise to a disproportionately high proportion of PCCRC. In this narrative literature review, we aimed to synthesise the current understanding of serrated polyps and their role in the development of CRC. Our review focuses on the prevalence of serrated lesions in various populations, risk of progression to advanced colorectal neoplasia and cancer, and the effect of serrated polyp detection on PCCRC rates. Serrated polyp detection is noted to be variable between studies based on the type of serrated polyps studied and the patient population in question. In addition, low-risk sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) do not seem to have a higher risk for progression to advanced neoplasia than conventional adenomas, while more advanced lesions (10 mm or larger, those with dysplasia and traditional serrated adenomas) do seem to have a higher malignant potential, particularly in combination with traditional adenomas. Finally, several studies demonstrate a decrease in PCCRC rates among endoscopists with higher serrated polyp detection metrics. We identified a need for standardising the definition of clinically significant serrated polyps for future monitoring and benchmarking of serrated polyp detection metrics, further research to determine the surveillance interval for patients with concomitant adenomas and serrated polyps, and widespread education and training for endoscopists and pathologists to improve detection, diagnosis and management of serrated lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.