ArticleJournal of safety research2025
On the road to school: A naturalistic study of adolescent bicyclist route safety.
Article in Journal of safety research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe rate of active transportation to school has significantly declined in recent decades. Safety concerns are a primary factor contributing to this decrease. This study aims to identify factors that impact the safety of students' bicycling chosen route including environmental features, social factors, as well as student and parent characteristics. Additionally, the study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of navigational applications such as Google Maps and Komoot in recommending safe cycling routes.
methodThe study sample included 32 adolescents (10-15 years old) and one parent/guardian for each of the adolescents. The dataset consisted of GPS and video data recorded by helmet cameras during students' bicycle trips to school. Furthermore, baseline surveys provided demographic information and bicycling habits from both adolescents and parents. To compare different routes, a safety score was calculated, derived from environmental factors, traffic conditions, and geometric features. Linear Mixed Models (LMM) were used to examine the relationship between potential predictors including adolescents and parents' demographics and environmental characteristics and the safety score assigned to each route.
resultsYounger students and those living in a more bike-friendly neighborhood chose safer routes to school. Participants rode on sidewalks more often when taking routes with lower safety scores, most likely to avoid traffic. Additionally, routes suggested by Komoot and the actual routes taken by students were safer than those suggested by Google Maps bike routing.
conclusionThe study's findings emphasized the significance of bike infrastructure in improving the safety of young bicyclists and increasing the rate of active transportation to school. It also highlights the critical role of safety interventions and parents guiding their children in safe bicycling behaviors, as well as children learning and applying safe route selection skills. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: Enhancing bike infrastructure and refining navigational apps to prioritize safer routes can improve student cycling safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.