Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41338644›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2025

European Registry of Next Generation Imaging in Advanced Prostate Cancer (RING): protocol for an international, prospective registry study.

Daria Chernysheva, Stefano Fanti, Anders Bjartell, Luca Afferi, Alberto Breda, Joan Palou, Anwar R Padhani, Francesco Sanguedolce

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06866782 (European Registry of Next Generation Imaging in Advanced Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06866782 recruitingnot on this map

European Registry of Next Generation Imaging in Advanced Prostate Cancer

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFundacio PuigvertRan2024 to 2026Enrolled600ConditionsProstate Cancer, Advanced Prostate Cancer, Metastatic Prostate Cancer (mPC)ArmsImaging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daria ChernyshevaUrooncology, Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0469-7007
Stefano FantiIRCCS AOU Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Anders BjartellSkåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Luca AfferiDepartment of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, LU, Switzerland.
Alberto BredaFundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
Joan PalouFundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
Anwar R PadhaniMount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.
Francesco SanguedolceUrology, Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain fsanguedol@fundacio-puigvert.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5242-7060

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNext-generation imaging (NGI), particularly with prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) tracers, enables earlier and more accurate detection of metastases. However, conventional imaging (CT and bone scan) remains more affordable and widely accessible and was the standard used in most pivotal trials that established current survival outcomes. As PSMA PET becomes more widely adopted, a stage migration effect is emerging. However, key uncertainties persist regarding the actual proportional employment of NGI in clinical practice, main indications for its use and the mid-term and long-term effects of an NGI-driven treatment pathway. Furthermore, when or whether CI alone might remain enough informative for the treatment decision-making is still unclear. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The European Registry of Next-Generation Imaging in Advanced Prostate Cancer is a non-profit, non-interventional, multi-centre, international, prospective, investigator-initiated registry that is intended to collect real-world data on how patients with prostate cancer at risk of harbouring metastasis (high-risk at initial diagnosis, or after primary treatment) are managed according to the type of imaging used for the systemic work-up. The registry is conducted in two phases: (1) cross-sectional analysis of imaging choices and their effect on clinical decision-making and (2) longitudinal follow-up evaluating survival outcomes such as progression-free survival (PFS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and skeletal-related events (SSEs). Statistical analyses will include descriptive analysis of demographic and clinical variables, comparative analysis between different imaging pathways, survival and prognostic analyses using Kaplan-Meier tests. The expected minimum sample size of the registry is 600 patients, and the planned follow-up duration is 24 months for the longitudinal follow-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Fundació Puigvert (#C2024/30), and ethics approval is required at all participating sites. All patients will provide written informed consent. The results will be disseminated widely and transparently to maximise their effect on clinical practice, research and patient care through peer-reviewed publications, presentations at international conferences as well as through patient advocacy groups and relevant patient websites. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06866782.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsRegistriesEuropeHumansMalePositron-Emission TomographyProspective StudiesResearch DesignClinical ProtocolsDiagnostic ImagingGenitourinary imagingNuclear radiologyProstateProstatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID41338644
PMCPMC12682192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.