Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41338638›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Virtual reality for the treatment of perinatal mental health: a rapid scoping review.

Chantal Zorzi, Jennifer Jean, Sylvana M Côté, Martin St-André, Anna L MacKinnon

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chantal ZorziUniversity of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7100-5405
Jennifer JeanUniversité de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Sylvana M CôtéUniversité de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Martin St-AndréUniversité de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Anna L MacKinnonUniversité de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada anna.mackinnon@umontreal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1705-2048

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the available virtual reality (VR) applications for treating perinatal mental health disorders, focusing on their effectiveness in reducing symptoms such as anxiety and depression, which are common during the perinatal period.

designRapid scoping review adhering to the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR), with adjustments based on the Cochrane Rapid Reviews guidelines. DATA SOURCES: Medline, PsychInfo, Embase, Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) Reviews using Ovid and Web of Science were searched through 20 February 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies were included if they were written in English or French, provided details on the VR technology, described the assessment of perinatal mood disorders and specified the outcomes measured and the methodological approach used. Review and editorial articles were excluded as well as abstracts and posters. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: One reviewer extracted study characteristics (eg, design, participants, VR components, outcomes) and a second reviewer verified accuracy; study quality was assessed using the National Institute of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment of Controlled Intervention Studies tool, and findings were synthesised narratively and in tabular form.

resultsA total of 425 records were identified. After removing duplicates, 308 records were screened by title and abstract. Of these, 74 full texts were assessed for eligibility, resulting in 10 studies being included for data extraction. These final studies were primarily conducted in high-income countries from 2019 to 2024. 8 of 10 (80%) were randomised controlled trials, employing VR through head-mounted displays. Studies predominantly targeted non-severe cases of anxiety and depression, with VR environments ranging from nature scenes to therapeutic content. Results suggest a positive impact of VR interventions on reducing anxiety and depression levels among participants.

conclusionsStudying VR appears to be a promising avenue for developing options to manage perinatal mental health. The immersive nature of VR may provide opportunities for emotional relief and support during this critical period through engaging experiences which can reduce symptoms of anxiety and depression. However, the body of research remains limited, indicating a need for further studies to explore the long-term benefits and potential integration of VR into perinatal healthcare practices. The promising results from initial studies encourage continued exploration and development within this innovative therapeutic field. STUDY REGISTRATION: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VFZC7.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionPerinatal CarePregnancy ComplicationsVirtual RealityFemaleHumansMental HealthPregnancyAnxiety disordersDepression & mood disordersMENTAL HEALTHPostpartum WomenPregnancyVirtual Reality

Identifiers

PMID41338638
PMCPMC12673547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.