ArticleBMJ open2025
Inequities in diabetes prevention and control in fragile, conflict-affected and vulnerable settings: a mixed-methods study from the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Undiagnosed Diabetes and Prediabetes in Yemen: A Growing Public Health Crisis in the Shadow of Conflict.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate progress in the implementation of the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office (EMRO) Regional Framework for Action on Diabetes Prevention and Control, identify implementation barriers and facilitators, and provide recommendations for accelerating progress, with a particular focus on fragile, conflict-affected and vulnerable settings (FCVs).
designMixed-methods study combining secondary analysis of quantitative data from WHO datasets with qualitative synthesis of inputs from WHO consultative meetings with EMR member states.
setting22 countries of the WHO EMR, including 10 classified as FCV and 12 as non-FCV according to World Bank and WHO classifications.
participantsQuantitative data were drawn from the 2021 WHO Country Capacity Survey targeting all EMR countries and other WHO sources. Qualitative data were based on insights from 16 country representatives during a regional WHO EMRO webinar, including non-communicable diseases programme managers, policy leads and WHO country office staff.
resultsAmong the 22 countries analysed, only 10% (1/10) of FCVs had a national diabetes action plan compared with 67% (8/12) of non-FCVs. A sugar-sweetened beverage tax was implemented in 75% (9/12) of non-FCVs but in just 10% (1/10) of FCVs. For diabetes management, detailed national guidelines were available in 30% (3/10) of FCVs compared with 83% (10/12) of non-FCVs; insulin was available in primary care in 50% (5/10) of FCVs compared with 83% (10/12) of non-FCVs. Surveillance systems were less robust in FCVs: while 70% (7/10) collected data on diabetes status, only 30% (3/10) had a national diabetes registry, compared with 83% (10/12) of non-FCVs.
conclusionsAddressing diabetes in the EMR requires strategic collaboration and tailored approaches for FCVs, including strengthened governance, preparedness, integrated care, medication access and surveillance. Prioritising primary healthcare and embedding diabetes prevention and control in universal health coverage and emergency response frameworks is critical to reducing inequities and improving health outcomes in fragile contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.