ArticleBMJ open2025
Effect of the index of consciousness 2 on intraoperative opioid dosage in ovarian cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFor ovarian cancer patients undergoing preoperative Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT), the toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents may cause hepatic and renal function impairment, altered sensitivity of the central nervous system or abnormal pain perception thresholds. These changes can further affect the metabolism and efficacy of intraoperative anaesthetics. However, the optimal intraoperative opioid dosage regimen for this specific patient population remains unclear. Currently, nociceptive stimulation monitoring technology has achieved certain progress in guiding intraoperative opioid administration. Among this technology, the index of consciousness 2 (IOC2), as a representative monitoring indicator in this field, provides important references for optimising opioid dosage regimens. This trial will investigate the opioid requirements and patient outcomes in the anaesthetic management of ovarian cancer patients undergoing preoperative NACT guided by IOC2. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This prospective, single-blind, single-centre randomised controlled trial will randomly recruit 90 patients undergoing open ovarian cancer cytoreductive surgery under general anaesthesia, with equal numbers assigned to the control and experimental groups. The experimental group will adjust the remifentanil plasma target concentration based on the IOC2 value, while the control group will adjust according to the patients' mean arterial pressure. The primary outcome will be intraoperative opioid use (calculated in morphine equivalents per hour). Secondary outcomes include the average intraoperative propofol dose, post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU)-related metrics (including extubation time, time to spontaneous eye opening and morphine consumption in PACU), pain levels at 4, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively, as well as the use of analgesics and antiemetics. Postoperative recovery quality will also be assessed, including time to first flatus, time to ambulation, length of hospital stay and the 24-hour Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study involves human participants and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Jiangsu Cancer Hospital (ethics no: XJS-2024-017). Patients gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part. The study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant academic conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2400091897.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.