Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41338414›Full record

ReviewIndian pacing and electrophysiology journal

Cardiovascular screening of athletes.

Sarandeep Marwaha, Sanjay Sharma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarandeep MarwahaCity St George's, University of London, UK. Electronic address: smarwaha@sgul.ac.uk.
Sanjay SharmaCity St George's, University of London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sudden death of an athlete causes grave concern among the medical, sporting, and lay communities, considering athletes epitomise the healthiest segment of society. Most decedents are asymptomatic, therefore screening to identify vulnerable individuals seems appropriate, particularly since most aetiologies can be detected during life and several therapeutic interventions can be implemented to minimise the risk. Given the diversity of conditions implicated in exercise related SCD, no single test will detect all disorders. Furthermore, the low incidence of SCD allows for a cost-effective approach using the simplest and most readily available tools. The 12-lead electrocardiogram has emerged as the most effective tool for detecting electrical diseases and raising suspicion of cardiomyopathy. The international recommendations for ECG interpretation allows for physiological remodelling, substantially reducing false positive rates. Nonetheless, the challenge remains, since the ECG will fail to identify up to 20 % of diseases implicated in young sudden cardiac death and is of limited value in middle-aged and older athletes, in whom atherosclerotic coronary artery disease dominates. Therefore, mitigation of risk extends beyond screening to encompass timely resuscitation, universal defibrillator access, and education in cardiac awareness. The future of screening for cardiovascular disease in athletes is likely to combine traditional evaluation with artificial intelligence, including the use of wearable monitoring, and equal access for effective screening worldwide.

Indexed as

AthleteDefibrillatorElectrocardiogramScreeningSudden cardiac death

Identifiers

PMID41338414
PMCPMC12958049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.