ArticleCurrent biology : CB2025
Non-uniform signal pooling across the foveola.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Two distinct modes of ocular drift observed during figure-ground perception.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- Before the eye moves: microsaccade preparation expands spatial integration at the center of gaze.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Object recognition is impacted by visual crowding. This phenomenon, attributed to cortical pooling, is generally studied in the periphery. Crowding mechanisms in the foveola-the 1° retinal region with highest resolution-remain unclear due to difficulties in controlling for optical factors and incessant fixational eye motion. Using high-resolution retinal imaging and retinal-contingent stimulus rendering to overcome these limitations, we demonstrated that the critical spacing at the preferred retinal locus approximates a single cone's diameter. However, just 0.25° away, mislocalization errors start to occur and the extent of crowding exceeds cone spacing. These results reveal that cortical pooling mechanisms may play a greater role with increasing foveolar eccentricity and point to a possible cortical magnification gradient effect within the central fovea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.